"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Wednesday, 14 June 2017


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A SPADE IS A SPADE..IS A SPADE ..IS A SPADE": 

An interesting historical interlude.

The Golf Glen lands were always privately owned. The reference to "Aurora land" is its location, not its title.

But a growing population, an exploding population, has to be located somewhere. 100 or so homes are just a drop in the bucket to provide for the approximately 25,000 population influx that is provincially planned for poor, dear "our town."

There is only a finite amount of land, unless you happen to be Holland, Singapore or China, where in-filling is really filling in.

The luxury days of single family homes are at an end and future residential accommodation might have to involve 3, 4 or 5 story buildings. That is the only way baseball diamonds or other recreational facilities can be provided for our children, or for ourselves. 

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 14 June 2017 at 19:35

The reality is the land is privately owned. The other reality is when people don't want anything to change in their neighbourhood , they tend to insist the municipality buy or otherwise obtain ownership.

The town  just did that with a 6 acre parcel in Mavric Land . Additional millions are to be spent to create a redundant park. 

I think the settlement agreed for the golf course is similar. Numbers of residential units are shrunk to a minimum and park area increased to a maximum. Cost per unit increases commensurately. 

Who cares? Not the developer. Time is money. They will agree to anything just to get going. 

Not Golf Glen or Mavricland residents that's for sure .They already have theirs. 

But more reprehensibly,  the consistent official position of some ,not all, politicians, is to do everything possible to accommodate the demands of some, not all, abutting homeowners.

It's the nature of the beast. It's certainly the easiest way to win votes. Always was. 

That's why there has always been an Ontario Municipal Board . 

There used  to be Municipal Planning Boards as well for the same reason. 

Politicians complained about that as well ,the same way they complain about the Ontario Municipal Board today. 


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "GYPSY..GYPSY..LIVES IN A TENT": 

Had the OMB not existed at the time of the Highland "agreement" between the parties it is conceivable that this development would not take place, or if done so, on a greatly reduced scale.

So the rape of Aurora land might have been negligible.

But leaving future development to local councils with little or no oversight might be even worse. 

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 14 June 2017 at 13:43


The golf course was never  "Aurora land". It has always been privately owned . Before  a golf course, it was a farm on the outside edge of Aurora in King Township. 

Homes abutting the erstwhile golf course came later but  have similar history. 

The  Nesbitt family were never accused of "raping" the land when the golf course was built. 

They  were not accused of being accessory to "rape" when they sold the land to Joe Shaw,
who was a developer at the time. He built a beautiful club house that was an asset to the community for many years . Nesbitt's built two more golf courses Westview and St. Andrew's

The town continued to grow out  into the countryside . I'm  certain, the seven-hundred and fifty families who bought homes in Regency Acres were glad of that. 

I raised my family here. Golf Glen subdivision was a small fill-in development between Regency and the golf course.

 Nobody objected to Regency Acres.

Nobody objected to Golf Glen. 

Instead of being developed ,the golf course continued for half a century longer. 

Now  that  planned fill-in development  is compared to the land being "raped".

There is nothing logical or reasonable about that. 

But it's not just illogical or unreasonable. 

Community  interest is nowhere reflected in opposition to vacant serviced land being developed. 

The opposite is true. 

Monday, 12 June 2017


Councillor Mrakas made the link available on Facebook for the Bill to establish the new Appeal Trubunal designed to disallow appeals from Municipal Official Plans. The bill has received First
Reading. Councillor Mrakas has put tremendous time and effort into organising support from municipalities across the length and breadth of the Province. 

A committee of the legislature was appointed and hearings were held for public input. 

I read it. I hate reading legislative acts. Writing does not improve. Clarity is clearly  not the objective.
 It's as if legal practitioners are afraid non-practitioners might discover the secret. 

Giving first reading to a Bill  is common practice. Three readings are required for it to pass. Even if  three readings proceed,  it can't be enacted until definitions and regulations are in place to enable enforcement. 

It used to add a year to the process. It might be better now.  And it might not. 

Councillor Mrakas is hopeful the signs and portents are positive. 

To-night's Global news had a relevant item. The provincially owned former lakefront power generation site in Missuassaga Is to be remediated and sold for multiple residential development. 

It's huge. Thousands of units will be accommodated. Worth millions it might  help reduce  debt
 caused by cancelling new generation mid contract. Two of McGuinty's staff might go to jail for 
wiling out records that traced the decision. 

This neighbourhood persuaded  McGuinty to cancel the project. Brought about his early retirement. 
and hangs around Premier Wynn's neck like a dead weight. 

The site is no doubt designated Industrial in Missuassaga's Official Plan. 

A change in Land Use designation will be necessary to allow residential development. It will change
the neighbourhood. 

We should watch that. 

It's not exactly a change from golf course open space to residential.  It is  multiplied many times 
over In neighbourhood impact. 

Thursday, 1 June 2017


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WITH DUE RESPECT": 

I bet that senior living building will have total occupancy before the doors are opened. Traffic? Pollution? Has anyone been to seniors home in Toronto? 
Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 31 May 2017 at 06:15


If the  building proposed is ever constructed, the comment is likely correct. 

For the same reason, people come from Toronto to buy multi-million dollar mansions because 
they would cost twice as much there, senior living facilities would quickly fill. Every vacant 
site in Aurora could be used for the purpose and they would still be fully occupied. It's a lucrative business. 

The Town  of Newmarket keeps moving forward in partnership with York Region to provide  rental housing for families and the elderly . Can't point to a single such development in the last twenty-five years in the Town of Aurora. 

But the discussion is  not about that. pay attention people. 

The town  recently  adopted a Secondary Plan for the  area.

It calls for a Culture Precinct. Whatever one thinks about that , it was approved during the last
term. It allows for residential intensification in the area; purpose being to cut down urban sprawl
 and make public transit an option for commuters. 

A Senior's Living Centre does neither. Though it suits the needs of the United Church, it contributes 
zilch, zero, nada, nil , to the Town's stated objective.

Without  a study or collected data to prove my contention, I'm willing to  bet Senior Living and day- long parking in every nook and cranny  in the town centre for commuters is high on change activity 
in the last several years. 

Neither contribute to re-vitalisation of  Aurora. 

The opposite is true.

If it were the Town's intention, it may be argued. 

But it's not. 

The Town has expended substantial resources developing an Official Plan that generates a different objective. 

The document went through all  legal requirements; advertising, public meetings, consultant studies, 
public input, endless routine occupying planners, and finally public approval and the stamp of authority. 

If this proposal is approved , it will prove once and for all, planning is a farce. 

Friday, 26 May 2017


My friend Councillor Mrakas has updated us on Facebook onthe status of the United Church rebuild 
proposal. The town's decision is not yet made but the item has been referred to the 
next general committee meeting. 

The Councillor is supportive and provides his rational. 

Tom is in  his third year serving of his first term on Council. He works hard and  provides a channel
for communication with constituents. Also offers information and his position on issues. It's. A mark of respect for those  he serves. 

In response I have to say on some issues, mais non, mon ami, Je suis disagree .

There is little about the United Church site that lends itself to senior living. 

At the time Seniors can be expected to be out and about, traffic is heavy on Yonge Street.  
Exhaust fumes are not good for health. Traffic lights barely provide enough time to cross.  

Amenities are few . Public green space is sparse and the site even less adequate. 

A retirement centre is the last thing likely to revitalize the core. It is not a better use of retail space. 
Seniors are not shoppers. 

The need cited  is not there . Retirement centres are probably second in growth only to the construction industry . It's a lucrative business and resources come from sale of seniors' homes.

What happens in York Region when seniors outlive their stash and York Region has to provide 
beds for the outcasts ? 

Council  is being coy about designation under the Official Plan. Completed in 2010 ,the Promenade Study ,was adopted in the Plan during the last Council term. The area is designated as a "Culture Precinct".  I'm fairly sure the "culture" referenced is not a community of elderly. 

The Planning Director has budgeted millions for fancy sidewalks,heritage lighting and street 
furniture. Build them , they will come and  shop and sit to rest from their  frenzied efforts of 
shopping in the block , wave to drivers and breathe in pollution. 
We've heard much about the sacrosanct Official Plan. This proposal requires a change in 
designation with  little to commend  it. Certainly no municipal interest. 

The library was built on Yonge Street twenty years ago. The library got busier the downtown did not.
Stores continued to close. 

Park Place Manor , with a huge presence, was built thirty years ago and still the downtown is moribund.

 Density Intensification  has been referenced . 

The purpose of provincial policy is to bring people on or near public transit routes to cut down on vehicular traffic and reduce urban sprawl. 

Seniors are not commuters . Crossing Yonge Street at the lights is a time challenge . 

There are no  good arguments for this proposal .

Council would do well to review the recent application for a Montessori  school in the vicinity with 
all the same details and difficulties. Thousands of hours were spent seeking ways and means to realise the project.In the end, it came to naught. The last thing mentioned were  soil tests.  

Construction is possible in most soil conditions. The question is one of  feasibility of cost and returns.

Furthermore, an Official Plan designation for high density multiple residential, is exactly what it says.
Nothing in the Plan designates a particular proponent. 

Monday, 15 May 2017


Forwarded: nothing to indicate I can't  share. I can't resist. 
President Trump was in the Oval Office when his telephone rang. 
"Hallo, President Trump, " a heavily accented voice said. "This is Archie, up 'ere at the Harp Seal Pub in Badger's Cove, Newfoundland, Canada, eh? I am callin' to tells ya dat we are officially declaring war on ya!" 

"Well Archie," Donald said, "This is indeed important news! How big is your army?" 
"Right now," said Archie, after a moments calculation "there is myself, me cousin Harold , me next-door-neighbor Mick, and the whole dart team from the pub. That makes eight!" 

Donald paused. "I must tell you Archie that I have one million men in my army waiting to move on my command." 
"Wow," said Archie. "I'll have at call ya back!" 
Sure enough, the next day, Archie called again. " to acquire some infantry equipment! We have two combines, a bulldozer, and Harry's farm tractor." 

President Trump sighed. "I must tell you Archie, that I have 16,000 
tanks and 14,000 armoured personnel carriers. Also I've increased my army to one and a half million since we last spoke." 

"Lord above," said Archie, "I'll be getting back to ya." 

Sure enough, Archie rang again the next day.. "President Trump, the war is still on! We have managed to git ourselves airborne! We up an' modified Harrigan's ultra-light wit a couple of shotguns in the cockpit, and four boys from the Legion have joined us as well!" 
Donald was silent for a minute and then cleared his throat. "I must tell you Archie that I have 10,000 bombers and 20,000 fighter planes. My military complex is surrounded by laser-guided, surface-to-air missile sites. And since we last spoke, I've increased my army to TWO MILLION!" 
"Jumpins, Lord tunderin! Two million, ye say!!" said Archie, " have to   call youse back."
Sure enough, Archie called again the next day. "President Trump! I am sorry to have to tell you dat we have had to call off dis 'ere war." 

"I'm sorry to hear that" said Donald. "Why the sudden change of heart?" 
"Well, sir," said Archie, "we've all sat ourselves down and had a long chat over a bunch of pints, and come to realize dat dere's no way we can feed two million prisoners." 


Senior Scholar
York University

Wednesday, 3 May 2017


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "GUEST POST ON VIMY RIDGE": 

I wrote the original post Evelyn. Thank you for publishing it.  

The Great War was a terrible time. I think more so than WWII. It was a time when technology was being tested but still "old school" tactics and weapons were being used.  

The airplane had only existed since 1903. Only 12 years later flimsy contraptions were being used to find and photograph the enemy, shoot down the enemy or bomb the enemy. Meanwhile, old-style trenches extended for hundreds and hundreds of miles. Most of them filled with mud, water, rats and death. The machine gun was a recent invention. No longer did you need to be an accurate shot, all you had to do is press the trigger and move it left to right and back again. The Germans created the first weapon of terror.... mustard gas. Put into artillery shells or just in canisters that were opened and let travel on the winds. Of course, this brilliant weapon was not lost on the allies, they developed their own gas weapons. 

Part of the success of the Vimy battle was attributed to the artillery barrage that "crept" in front of the troops. As the shells fell and exploded, the troops moved behind them. After a period of time, the guns were adjusted to shoot a little further, and then the troops moved up behind.  

I visited France and Belgium two years ago. If anyone needs to understand the horror of this conflict, you only need to drive along any road in the Calais area. You can be driving along and a small cemetery appears. In some cases it may be as small as 10-15 headstones. But, the Commonwealth War Graves Commission maintains every one of these cemeteries. The grass is immaculate. Dead flowers are disposed of. Broken headstones are replaced. At the entrance to every cemetery, there is a nook with a door. In there is a binder with a catalogue of all those buried there and in needed, a map to help find the grave.  

The Vimy memorial itself, contains the names of every Canadian solder that was killed but their body never recovered. The names go all around the structure. To further bring some reality to the area, the grounds of the park area where the memorial is located have not changed substantially in 100 years. There are craters from the shelling. Signs and wires tell you to not go into those areas because there is still unexploded ordinance there. Inside that area are sheep grazing. It is more pleasant to pick up exploded sheep than exploded people.  

Travel a little further east and you go to the Town of Ypres, Belgium. Google Ypres and look at the pre-1915 photos and compare to 1918. The town was levelled. They rebuilt it and you would never know what savage destruction was here. On the east entrance to the town is the Menin Gate. A large structure that contains the name of every Commonwealth soldier that was killed but who's body was never found. Thousands of names.  

A final thought. Driving down those roads and you come to a cemetery. The headstones for the allies are bright white granite. I happened by a German cemetery. All of those grave markers were black. Think about the imaging of that. 

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 3 May 2017 at 14:27


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "STEALING FROM PETER TO PAY PAUL IS NOT A FORMULA F...": 

Most Aurorans have known for years that the land base requires going up with buildings. Still the politicians hark back to years ago when urban sprawl was possible. A couple of our councillors " get " it, but the squabbling will prevent meaningful decisions. Cllr Abel looks for a fight on every issue and Sandra blows with every breeze.

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 3 May 2017 at 08:29

You know, that's not true about limits of the land base. When Aurora is built out to the boundary, the Province will simply expand the boundary : probably to the east.

Already no division exists between our town and Newmarket. Fire protection is shared. Police, transit, water, sewers and planning authority are all regional. As is education. 

As long as the federal government continues to encourage immigration and as long as immigrants 
are  drawn to the GTA , demand for housing will continue to grow. 

Public investment in infrastructure is in the GTA . No effort or incentive is taken to direct newcomers to less dense regions and even sparsely  populated areas are being vacated in favour of the GTA.

Housing is an essential part of the economy. 

All things spring from the housing industry. Furnishings,gardening  implements ,furniture and supplies and automobiles.

The retail industry needs a market. Hospitals with expensive technology need to be centralized . 

Most people like to be where people are. 

They will continue to arrive and towns will continue to grow. 

Aurora will be a amalgamated with Newmarket and  the new town will not  be called Aurora. 

It will be a sad day but only for those of us who knew how it was. 

I can't believe how many believe that Aurora will stop growing when infilling is complete. The 
Province created new  boundaries in 1971 .They will do it again when the need arises. 

We will have wards then for sure. Aurora will be a single ward and we will have one or perhaps two representatives in the new town. 

Forty-nine per cent of the electorate will turn out to vote if there's a mayoralty contest and nineteen 
per  cent if there isn't. 

Like always. 

On the plus  side, we might bring  back industries that left with the North American Free Trade 

Tuesday, 2 May 2017


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WAR HAS NO WINNERS": 

to 19:33 and 18:40....

The "Nation Building" that occurred at Vimy is a topic that came up a lot over the last few months in preparation for the centennial, however I think you must go back 100 years to fully understand the rationale.  

In the first few years of the Great War, the Canadian units deployed in France and Belgium were under the control of British Army Generals. They (as well as other Commonwealth units) were considered mere extensions of the British Army. Vimy Ridge was the first battle that all four Canadian divisions were combined into a common force. The "nation building" was really the unification of these units. After the successful battle of Vimy Ridge the British High-Command realized that the Canadians can be a force on their own. To that end, there eventually was the assigning the Canadians a leadership that was Canadian too. No longer a part of the British, they were a force of their own.  

Back on the home front in 1917, the success of the Vimy battle was seen as a successful unification of Canadians from all corners of the country. Also, remember that all of these men were volunteers - there was no conscription at this time. 

As some background information. My Grandfather and great-uncle (his bother) both came to Canada from northern England in 1905. Both were married (my grandfather with 2 daughters) enlisted into the CEF (Canadian Expeditionary Force) in late 1915. They shipped out to England in the summer of 1916. In January 1917, my grandfather was wounded in a battle south of Vimy that was meant as a rehearsal for Vimy. He missed the Vimy battle, but my great-uncle fought and was wounded at Vimy, and continued with all of the major battles for the rest of the war and even served in the occupation forces post 11/11/18.  

It is unfortunate that the current political talking heads try to wrap themselves in a flag and talk about nation-building when they really do not know what they are talking about.

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 2 May 2017 at 12:22

Monday, 1 May 2017


I Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "STEALING FROM PETER TO PAY PAUL IS NOT A FORMULA F...": 

I can already see the wind out of the sails from some members of council. There will be a few who will not be running next year, and a few who will who shouldn't.

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 1 May 2017 at 13:20


Again my finger didn't tap precisely. The comment was rejected though my intent was to 
publish. I hope the writer didn't mean to suggest Councillor  Mrakas should not be a candidate. 
He works hard at the job and he's the only one who puts himself out there on Facebook. 

Every time he does and I engage with him, his friends think he needs to be defended. I think he's perfectly capable of holding his own. 

I have to say this though. When I was a new Councillor, only myself and Pete Miller were new and 
sat at the bottom of the table. Bill Johnston had been clerk/treasurer forever. When he told council what we could or could not do, there was never any argument. 

He sat at a small separate table. If council was going down the wrong way he slipped a note across to Mayor Clarence Davis at the time. 

We soon learned decisions were not made based simply on personal opinion. Principles and 
precedents and policies were regularly cited and respected and judgement exercised.

Staff provided the continuity that made sure lessons learned in the past were remembered and applied. 

If a bylaw was proposed, Bill Johnson knew if it had been tried elsewhere and whether or not it 
had stood the test of a court challenge. There were many times more municipalities in
Ontario than now, and municipal staff kept in touch. 

There was no shame in being a new Councillor and needing time to learn. Everyone was helpful.
The community was encouraging. They had made an investment. 

Former Councillor Grace Marsh asked once how a Councillor was supposed to know all 
that was needed . I answered it was not possible and one had to rely on staff for guidance. 
It was true at the time.

One by one experienced professionals who had kept the municipality on an even keel were replaced.

Council no longer functioned as it should. Recommendations from staff took a circuitous route. Councillors no longer had the benefit of referral to policies, principles and precedents, Municipal Act regulations and their intent on the decision-making process. 

Decisions were made, then council was informed. 

It continued beyond the Mormac regime. Councillors are at an extreme disadvantage. For the most part it suited the new Head of Council just fine. 

He needed to win the trust and earn respect of Councillors at the outset. He didn't even try. 

He didn't even try. 

I note he often finds himself in a minority of two.  

Now he pays the price. 

Unfortunately the town also pays a price and is equally poorly served. 


I had a wee back and forth with Councillor Mrakas on Facebook last week. It started with the
Councillor's post, from his perspective,of  news of a  tender for the  6 acre  Mavrinac park . The bid is apparently a third over estimate.Combined cost of land and construction is currently expected  to be $5 million. Even those who pushed for the land to be purchased by the town said they would not expect the town to spend that amount. 

I opposed transfer of the land from private to public purpose. Full cost is still neither disclosed or acknowledged. 

Legal  fees to extort the acquisition are not listed. 

According to the town's master recreation plan, the neighbourhood  is better  served with parks than most. The legal  process for acquiring  land and resources for a park were already satisfied by the subdivision agreement. 

Forfeited Revenue  from potential development represents an expenditure. 

It is anything but efficient financial management. II

In his own words Councillor Mrakas believes the  town is better served  with more green space than with "legoland housing" and cites studies to  show growth does not pay for itself . Every $1 of development revenue  costs $1.30 to service.  

Tax increases despite new assessment are certainly contra- indicated. 

Growth is not to blame. 

Council without a glimmer of its purpose  is the clear and evident factor.  

Numerous examples  of senseless extravagance highlight  gross financial mis-management during 
the last three council terms.

Mavrinac is only the most current. 

The park planned for the erstwhile golf course development is another.

Hallmark Cards property has changed from private,revenue producing, to public ownership. 

Acres of land around the railway station have been taken out of revenue production to hold hundreds of cars coming in to town to be parked every day. 

Queen's York Rangers occupy a town property with a  thirty year lease. The town has all the responsibilities of landlord.  If that isn't an outright f---g gift, I am a monkey's uncle. 

The town parks department was evicted  from the building to make room for QYR. That created  the need for a new site and architect -designed  public works and parks facility.

  It's built but incomplete . The project was mis-managed from start to finish just like the one immediately previous. We still don't know the eventual cost. Two of the officials  responsible  have already flown the coop.  

Council has asked for an audit to determine where the fault lies.

 " It lies with thee, dear Brutus" it was a mess from the start.They had to appoint a citizen to fill 
a vacancy to get the vote they needed.  

The Culture Centre's continues to siphon a million dollars annuallyfrom town coffers. 

If it's so damned popular why isn't it paying for itself? 

The Promenade Plan adopted  six years ago  at considerable expense has contributed nothing but gobbledigoop to downtown revitalization: zero, zilch, nada, nothing ,Amen my friend. 

The list is endless.Councillor Mrakas doesn't know half of it. Their ideas of financial efficiency in municipal management continues what the Mormac cult  introduced. 

Taking serviced land out of development is absolutely counter-productive . 

Soaring costs have far more to do with fungal growth between the ears of those  responsible 
than it ever has to do with growth of the municipality. 

Sunday, 30 April 2017


TAnonymous has left a new comment on your post "WAR HAS NO WINNERS": 

Why is anybody surprised by Sajan. After all he is a Liberal. The party that gave us a cabinet minister hailed to be from Afghanistan but actually born in Iran or better yet Jag Bhaduria.

Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 30 April 2017 at 09:23


And there was  Jean Augustine: came  to Canada as a domestic and left children in the care of her mother. 

Soon she quit domestic service job ,brought her children to Canada and claimed welfare assistance. While living off the state, she acquired education sufficient to become an elementary school teacher and from there was appointed school principal in very short order. 

Jean Chretien chose her as a candidate for a  riding predominantly Jamaican. Upon election, the Prime Minister appointed her Minister of State for Canadian Women's Affairs.

When Jag Bhaduria brought disrepute upon the Liberal Party and was expelled, Augustine and one other person of colour accused the government of racism. 

She retained her cabinet post. 

Bhaduria also kept his seat despite petitions in his riding demanding he be fired.  

He travelled extensively at government expense and competed for the nomination in the next election,
surrounded  by Sikh supporters. 

Not much sign there of an understanding of Canadian culture or traditions. 

Augustine's later bio did not include particulars of early beginnings  in Canada. 

Except for reporting the accusation against the party that gave her high opportunity ,no 
critical comment or editorial surfaced: nothing at all to indicate absent judgement.

No worse  than a cabinet minister lying about personal participation in a military expedition and 
despite clear evidence of complete lack of integrity or any understanding of any expected standard,
He is also apparently being allowed to keep his cabinet post. 

Politics is no worse and no better than any other profession. There are good guys and bad. The
difference is, if leaders don't do what they should ,voters most likely will and the good will be 
shoveled out with the bad .

Eventually, no decent candidates will put their names forward. We may be close to that point in 

We may have all the freedom of a democratic society but if there's nothing to choose between; 

When the North Wind Blows and we have nothing but snow, what will  Robin do then,poor thing?

Friday, 28 April 2017


I had given up on a response to my last post. Under the circumstance , it was  hard not to conclude the topic was without interest 
So...the comment was welcome on two scores. Someone else was interested and vastly better informed on the topic. 

My focus is on the lives at risk and family devastation.

It still is. 

I can't imagine when and where the protective devices listed in the comment may have been tested and proved effective in actual battle. 

I don't trust the military easily. 

I grew up during the Second World War. I believe,more than anything else, propaganda and Winston Churchill sustained the British long enough to outlast the Germans. 

It certainly wasn't Americans alongside. 

Poles rode out on horses to meet German tanks. The French had the Maginot Line which was never utilised because the Quisling government signed an early Concordat with the Nazis. 

The British were totally unprepared. Churchill had been dismissed as a warmonger until the day war was declared. 

 After it was over, books and movies mostly told of epic battles and stories of individual bravery. There was no shortage of material. Much of it could not be told during the hostilities. 

I was an avid reader and movies were a favourite past time. Even when there was no heat in the cinemas and regular power outages meant the movie was cut off. 

Oh how the misery lasted  for years after. 

Long ago, I came to my own private conclusion, there are no winners in war: no genius is employed. 

Losers are decided by whichever side makes the most or last mistake and resources  are exhausted.
And of course,  hundreds of thousands of dead, on all sides. 

At the end, German boys were taken from their classrooms, put Into uniform and sent to the Russian front. Allied soldiers were shooting German children. 

Hostilities between the States and Japan ended when the Atom Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the full horror was realised. 

When the war  ended in Europe, the Americans brought German scientists to the States to continue 
the race to be first to develop the atom bomb

The lessons unevenly learned, are long forgotten. 

As far as  Trump and the American military are concerned, the Second World War and it's dreadful consequences might never have taken place. 

There were no winners : no gold, silver or bronze medalists.

Tuesday, 25 April 2017


USS Carl Vinson is the aircraft carrier the American president claimed was heading in an Armada to 
North Korea. He was kidding. The ship was nowhere near Korea. 

Officials as usual, were left to explain the difference between facts and the President running -off at the mouth. 

The Chinese are not amused . The crazy coot in power in North Korea is threatening to sink USS Carl Vinson. it would seem to be a logical response . 

It wouldn't even call for a nuclear option. Plain old-fashioned TNT,in sufficient quantity, would likely do the trick in short order. 

It seems likely for North Koreans not to sit and wait for the Americans to board the ninety-five planes and helicopters on the carrier and scoot over to drop bombs on their heads. 

How often did we hear the clown in the Oval Office talk about the foolishness of letting the
enemy know intent  beforehand? 

As noted, the Chinese are reported to be angry. 

There's a Joker in the White House. A Joker in Pyongyang .No Batman. 

 6,000 young Americans  on the USS Carl Vinson wherever she is at the moment. 

Seems likely they will need to be on board to bring the cruiser off the coast of Korea . 

A nuclear submarine is to join the fleet.

More young Americans on board : fathers ,sons,brothers,maybe mothers,daughters and sisters. 

6,000 souls and then some. 

At home, mothers,fathers,wives,children,siblings....waiting.

Friday, 14 April 2017


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "THERE'S ALWAYS ANOTHER SIDE":

I appreciate and respect the work and service firefighters provide to all of us. They truly are the first responders to an emergency. I've witnessed numerous emergencies where police haven't been around and had to respond and act as both firefighter and cop. Unfortunately their political influence has always been immeasurable to all politians along with the police, teachers and many other government unions. It should be of no surprise how their "collective" agreements are signed. 
Posted by Anonymous to  Our Town and Its Business at 14 April 2017 at 09:37


Political influence of firefighters has deeper roots and less to do with the union than most realise.

Historically, for most of Ontario,Volunteer  Brigades were the initial and only organisation within 
a community. 

There may even still be small communities  in the Province dependent on Volunteer Firefighters 
for  programs that bring a community together ; from fire protection, organising baseball,support for widows and orphans and anything else that might require a collective effort. 

When I was first elected in Aurora, the Mayor and several Councillors were former Volunteers.
I soon learned that had been the ongoing pattern since the beginning of settlement.Everything grew out of that initial organisation. 

In my time the  Fire Chief was on the town's payroll. He was chosen from the membership by the 
Volunteers. He was in his mid-seventies, showing no signs of retirement. 

Firefighters were paid once a year; $5. a call. 

Council was organized in Standing Committees. Finance ,Works, Parks , Police ,Fire  and Bylaws.

Citizens served on boards and Commissions;Planning Board, Recreation Commission . A council member represented the town on these independent bodies. The library board was appointed by Boards of Education .The  Mayor was Council's representative. 

Aurora's  Reeve and Deputy Reeve represented the town at York County  and a town appointee served on the Holland Valley Conservation Authority. 

Standing committees numbered two members and a chair. 

Most Councillors chaired a committee and served as vice chair or member on another. 

All members were entitled to attend and participate in discussion at  committee level. Only
appointed members could vote. 

Members received staff advice at Committee level and recommended to Council.Only Councillors participated in Council debate .  Committee Reports and recommendations were presented by the Chair. The Chair  had to be prepared to respond to questions and support recommendations. 

The town was responsible only for services to property. Councillors soon learned what they needed to know to be accountable for  decisions made. The public were kept informed through the grape vine and two newspapers. Editorials  were published weekly.

Council meetings were not televised. Committee meetings were in camera. 

With ten times the population and elections reduced from once a year, to one in four,
turn-out was pretty much the same now as it was then.